Skip to main content

Moral Capitalism and the Demise of Bill O'Reilly.

It's becoming more and more clear that certain behaviors are no long acceptable in the corporate public world.  Or at least, it's unacceptable to get caught. 

So we all know what's happened to Bill O'Reilly. 

But it ain't like it's news.  He was always a horndog.  Everyone knew it.  And no one cared.  Not, that is, until advertisers began pulling the plug. 

Why did Bill O'Reilly go?  Not protestors, certainly not morality.  His show is caput because the big money turned against.  Him. 

That, by the way, is why North Carolina now has a Democratic Governor and why that state's legislature (sort of) repealed the "bathroom bill."

Money folks.  Money. 

It makes the world go round.  It ain't about protests, or social media outrage.  If we want to make the world change, if we want the powerful classes to begin listening to the masses you need to hit them  in the wallet.  You don't like what a certain network shows?  Forget bitching about it, and stop watching.  Or better yet, stop patronizing their sponsors. 

You don't like fake news sites?  Research their advertisers, and tell them about it. 

You don't like how one company or another treats their employees.  Close your wallet to them. 

This is a power the people have.  And it is the greatest power of action on earth, the power of the purse.  So stop talking, and start doing.  Or not doing.  Or, preferably, spending and not spending.  Peace out. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A NOTE FROM THE DONALD TRUMP BOOK OF JOKES, IRONY AND SARCASM

Today I read an article (in a Gannet Newspaper), informing us that the Secret Service is closing the sidewalk near the South Lawn of the White House die to increased incidents there, including some with (there words, not mine) "the mentally ill." NOW.... There is a lot I can say...a lot any of us can say.  But, frankly, if the standard the if that's the Secret Service's standard, perhaps they should look into shutting down the White House Residence.  Special Note:  I don't care for Trump.  These posts most of them depressingly humorous will be a recurring series here. 

Founders vs. Franers: A History Lesson

We spend a lot of time studying the founders.  Or is it the framers?  Well, we've come to use both terms to describe the same people, but really folks, there's a difference.  And no, this is not a semantic argument, this really matters.  This is history, and it's important to get it right.  Of course it's important to clarify at the outset that we're discussing the people, almost all men, unfortunately, who created America.  The "Founding" depending on how one views it, lasted for between 25 and 50 years.  Without question, it began in 1765 when the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act.  When it ended is a matter for debate, but that's another story.  This is about the people.  Now, who are the founders?  Tough question.  There are literally hundreds, even thousands of them.  Anyone who contributed to the founding is a founder.  Pretty simple right?  Some examples: Anyone who signed the Declaration of Independence. Anyone who sighed the Con

We Don't Want Your Fucking Wall, We Don't Want YOU Trump At All

You see Mr. (un)President, I don't want a wall. I don't want if if we must pay for it. I don't want it if you manage to wave a magic wand and convince the Mexicans to pay for it. No, I do not want it at all. I want a civilization. Walls, meant to keep people out (or in), are not civilized. I want education - that is civilized. I want healthcare - that is civilized. I want to take care of the poor - that is civilized.   I want to take care of the elderly - that is civilized. I want to take care of the disabled - that is civilized. I want to take care of the planet - that is civilized. I want to promote universal human equality - that is civilized. I want to take care of veterans - that is civilized. Ok? Got it, Mr. Trump? Got it nationalistic populists? There is no good reason for a wall. There is no good reason to keep pushing these faux national security policies if you intend to destroy the society you are supposed to be securing.