Skip to main content

Best & Worst Presidents: A Series

Over the course of the coming days and weeks, I will be offering up my list, from one through forty-two the Presidents from worst to best. 

Why only 42?  Simple.  Technically, we are up to the 45th President.  BUT, Grover Cleveland is counted twice.  Add to that the fact the James Garfield served less than six months and William Henry Harrison only one month, it is my opinion that these two men did not serve long enough to be judged.  In fact, an list which includes them, as many aggregate lists attempt to do is acting irresponsibly and unfairly. 

The series will begin today or tomorrow with Donald Trump. 

Note:  I will lust the Presidents as *I* as a student of history view them.  I will base my views on the FACTS available.  My rules as far as judging Presidents limit the judgments only to the terms of their Presidencies.  As such a lesser President such as U.S. Grant gets no credit for his military success, nor would a man such as George H.W. Bush be blamed for the mistakes of the previous administration, though those chicken may have come home to roost in his term.  Again, these judgments will be reserved to each president's actions during their terms of office.  Nothing else will be considered. 

If you are looking for an assessment of the men in general, rather than the men as President, go elsewhere. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A NOTE FROM THE DONALD TRUMP BOOK OF JOKES, IRONY AND SARCASM

Today I read an article (in a Gannet Newspaper), informing us that the Secret Service is closing the sidewalk near the South Lawn of the White House die to increased incidents there, including some with (there words, not mine) "the mentally ill." NOW.... There is a lot I can say...a lot any of us can say.  But, frankly, if the standard the if that's the Secret Service's standard, perhaps they should look into shutting down the White House Residence.  Special Note:  I don't care for Trump.  These posts most of them depressingly humorous will be a recurring series here. 

Founders vs. Franers: A History Lesson

We spend a lot of time studying the founders.  Or is it the framers?  Well, we've come to use both terms to describe the same people, but really folks, there's a difference.  And no, this is not a semantic argument, this really matters.  This is history, and it's important to get it right.  Of course it's important to clarify at the outset that we're discussing the people, almost all men, unfortunately, who created America.  The "Founding" depending on how one views it, lasted for between 25 and 50 years.  Without question, it began in 1765 when the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act.  When it ended is a matter for debate, but that's another story.  This is about the people.  Now, who are the founders?  Tough question.  There are literally hundreds, even thousands of them.  Anyone who contributed to the founding is a founder.  Pretty simple right?  Some examples: Anyone who signed the Declaration of Independence. Anyone who sighed the Con

We Don't Want Your Fucking Wall, We Don't Want YOU Trump At All

You see Mr. (un)President, I don't want a wall. I don't want if if we must pay for it. I don't want it if you manage to wave a magic wand and convince the Mexicans to pay for it. No, I do not want it at all. I want a civilization. Walls, meant to keep people out (or in), are not civilized. I want education - that is civilized. I want healthcare - that is civilized. I want to take care of the poor - that is civilized.   I want to take care of the elderly - that is civilized. I want to take care of the disabled - that is civilized. I want to take care of the planet - that is civilized. I want to promote universal human equality - that is civilized. I want to take care of veterans - that is civilized. Ok? Got it, Mr. Trump? Got it nationalistic populists? There is no good reason for a wall. There is no good reason to keep pushing these faux national security policies if you intend to destroy the society you are supposed to be securing.