Skip to main content

Founders vs. Franers: A History Lesson

We spend a lot of time studying the founders.  Or is it the framers?  Well, we've come to use both terms to describe the same people, but really folks, there's a difference. 

And no, this is not a semantic argument, this really matters.  This is history, and it's important to get it right. 

Of course it's important to clarify at the outset that we're discussing the people, almost all men, unfortunately, who created America.  The "Founding" depending on how one views it, lasted for between 25 and 50 years.  Without question, it began in 1765 when the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act.  When it ended is a matter for debate, but that's another story.  This is about the people. 

Now, who are the founders?  Tough question.  There are literally hundreds, even thousands of them.  Anyone who contributed to the founding is a founder.  Pretty simple right?  Some examples:

Anyone who signed the Declaration of Independence.
Anyone who sighed the Constitution. 
Most leaders of the Continental Army.
Most leaders of the resistance and insurgency effort in Boston from 1765 onward.
Thomas Paine
John Jay
Abigail Adams
Most members of the First Continental Congress
Most members of the Second Continental Congress
Some members of the Congress of the Confederation
Most members of the committees of the several states for ratification of the Constitution. 
And so on...

BUT who are the framers.  All of these people? NO!

The framers are an exclusive group.  A few dozen at most.  The Framers are those who were involved in framing our current government, that is to say, those men who created, or invented as it were, the Constitution of the United States.  In broad terms the 39 delegates who signed the constitution could be considered Framers.  However, I would narrow it farther.  I would suggest that only those who were directly involved in the calling of the convention and those who directly influenced the final product should be considered. 

Among them,
George Washington
Alexander Hamilton
James Madison
Gouverneur Morris
James Wilson

Are there any Framers who did not sign the Constitution? Yes.  BUT they must have been in some way directly or indirectly involved with the calling of the convention, or the ratification of the final document, or have in some way been involved in the theory behind the form of government created by the Constitution. 

Among these,
John Adams
Robert Morris
John Jay



So Ok?  Do we understand the difference now between a Founder and a Framer.  I sure hope so!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A NOTE FROM THE DONALD TRUMP BOOK OF JOKES, IRONY AND SARCASM

Today I read an article (in a Gannet Newspaper), informing us that the Secret Service is closing the sidewalk near the South Lawn of the White House die to increased incidents there, including some with (there words, not mine) "the mentally ill." NOW.... There is a lot I can say...a lot any of us can say.  But, frankly, if the standard the if that's the Secret Service's standard, perhaps they should look into shutting down the White House Residence.  Special Note:  I don't care for Trump.  These posts most of them depressingly humorous will be a recurring series here. 

We Don't Want Your Fucking Wall, We Don't Want YOU Trump At All

You see Mr. (un)President, I don't want a wall. I don't want if if we must pay for it. I don't want it if you manage to wave a magic wand and convince the Mexicans to pay for it. No, I do not want it at all. I want a civilization. Walls, meant to keep people out (or in), are not civilized. I want education - that is civilized. I want healthcare - that is civilized. I want to take care of the poor - that is civilized.   I want to take care of the elderly - that is civilized. I want to take care of the disabled - that is civilized. I want to take care of the planet - that is civilized. I want to promote universal human equality - that is civilized. I want to take care of veterans - that is civilized. Ok? Got it, Mr. Trump? Got it nationalistic populists? There is no good reason for a wall. There is no good reason to keep pushing these faux national security policies if you intend to destroy the society you are supposed to be securing.